The post-214 situation in Afghanistan following the drawdown of the US/NATO/ International Security Assistance Force, has been the subject of a most perplexing debate in recent times with the major obscurity lying in predicting the actual intentions of various actors involved in the Afghan imbroglio. Fixated on Afghanistan's looming challenges, often a bleak picture of the embattled country's future has been drawn in the international media and academia which anticipated that the volatility of Afghanistan would lead to regional instability and colossal security challenges, especially in the period beyond 214. However, the narrative of despair was supplemented by a narrative of opportunity where proposals envisioning Afghanistan's role as a fulcrum for trade and cooperation were being drawn up on the basis of an argument that hegemonic prescriptions do not sustain themselves. Nation-building, it was said, could proceed on the basis of economic development, social harmony, rule of law and participatory democracy in consonance with the wishes of the Afghan people; and that a regional order which is yet to emerge is a pressing need in order to avoid intensified regional rivalry.